Comerica Inc. v. 5th Third Bankcorp, 282 F. Supp. 2d 557 (E.D. Mich. 2003)
COMERICA Incorporated, an effective Delaware company, Plaintiff, v. 5th Third BANKCORP, a financial holding team, Fifth 3rd Bank, an effective Michigan charter financial, and you can Fifth Third Bank, an ohio constitution lender, Defendants.
This might be a trademark situation saying infringement when you look at the ticket away from part 43 of one’s Lanham Trading- Act), 15 You.S.C. 1125(a) and you can Yards.C.L.An excellent. 429.4(a).
Plaintiff Comerica Incorporated (Comerica) is a professional lender payday loans Borrego Springs based inside Detroit, Michigan having a major presence on the all the way down half of the latest all the way down peninsula away from Michigan. Additionally works in 2 other states. Defendants Fifth 3rd Bankcorp, Fifth Third Lender, an excellent Michigan rent bank, and you will Fifth Third Lender, an ohio rental Lender (along, Fifth 3rd) are a professional financial based in Cincinnati, Ohio that have a serious exposure regarding all the way down peninsula from Michigan. it operates from inside the 7 almost every other Midwestern says.
A property collateral financing device is generally an adaptable type of borrowing from the bank safeguarded because of the borrower’s equity about borrower’s home as a consequence of a second financial.
Comerica filed fit into ages. Towards , the fresh Judge stored a hearing toward Comerica’s action for a primary injunction. By the incorrect belief at the conclusion of the newest hearing you to definitely Fifth 3rd pirated making use of FLEXLINE upon arriving at Michigan specific 2 years shortly after Comerica first started the play with, this new Court issued a preliminary in the.
(read more)